Allegra_w0kzhc

Allegra Kirkland

Allegra Kirkland is a New York-based reporter for Talking Points Memo. She previously worked on The Nation’s web team and as the associate managing editor for AlterNet. Follow her on Twitter @allegrakirkland.

Articles by

Testifying before the Senate on Thursday, Christine Blasey Ford recalled the story of her alleged sexual assault by Brett Kavanaugh as a teenager and described the trauma of having to relive that experience at a public hearing aired live on TV.

For some on the far-right, her account was mockable. In Twitter posts, they heaped scorn on Blasey Ford as a Democratic Party pawn who was unreliable because some details of the 36-year-old account changed over multiple retellings.

At one point Ford, a psychologist, said that what stuck with her most is the “uproarious laughter” Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge shared during the alleged assault.

“’Indelible in the hippocampus’ Ford says,” tweeted conservative radio host Buck Sexton. “She is an expert in memory, you see, but is missing some very important memories here.”

Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin joked about the “giant black hole through which” the details of Ford’s account “disappeared.”

Several others mocked Ford as faking the emotion she expressed while reading her prepared statement and answering questions.

“I wonder if she cried the first hundred times she practiced the stmt prepared by her lawyers for her to read?” legal blogger Scott Greenfield wrote.

“Oooo I’m such a baby that I need coffee in order to stop fake crying and I’m going to use a baby voice so you all think I’m a little girl,” Pizzagate conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer said in one of a stream of mocking tweets.

“I’m laughing,” senior Townhall columnist Kurt Schlichter said in response to author Molly Jong-Fast’s tweet: a photo of Ford speaking captioned “I’m crying.”

Stefan Molyneux, a prominent voice on the far-right, claimed that Ford was only providing this account publicly because “the Democrats hate Kavanaugh, and she is a Democrat.”

Donald Trump Jr. retweeted over a dozen posts casting doubt on Ford’s credibility and noting that she could not recall details of some conversations she had this year. He also joked that she managed to fly to Washington, D.C. for the hearing and make other trips via airplane despite a professed fear of flying.

Many mainstream conservatives distanced themselves from these critiques and cruel jokes, saying that they found Ford to be a credible, compelling witness.

GOP congressional aides told TPM that the proceedings were a “mess” and that Ford’s testimony “was bad for Kavanaugh and Republicans.”

Fox News’ Brit Hume called her “very sympathetic” in the network’s live coverage, while his colleague Chris Wallace called the hearing “a disaster for the Republicans.”

The National Review Online’s Jonah Golberg wrote that Ford appeared “very sympathetic and sincere.”

Read More →

The last thing Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee want is a televised Anita Hill redux.

They are taking pains to carefully stage-manage the Thursday hearing in which Christine Blasey Ford will testify about her sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Rather than asking questions themselves, the all-male GOP members of the committee will mostly outsource that responsibility to Arizona sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell. Security has been provided to Ford, who received death threats after going public with her allegations.

But the California professor’s allegations are centered around the hyper-sensitive topics of alcohol use and attempted sexual assault, meaning Mitchell will have to tread carefully to avoid appearing to victim-blame or cast Ford as a liar. Attorneys who have represented victims in sexual assault cases told TPM that she will likely make an effort to grill both Ford and Kavanaugh in equal measure.

“This entire show is not for the truth, right, it’s for the show?” D.C. attorney Les Alderman told TPM. “It’s to convince constituents that they’re either justified in voting for the guy or not voting for him. So it’s all about sound-bites and it’s all about the perception of the hearing.”

“If the perception is it’s not fair—he was given softball questions and she was crucified—that’s going to be a problem for Republicans going into the midterms,” Alderman continued. “But if Ms. Mitchell is consistent with her questions of both, then I don’t think there will be a way to attack the process from that standpoint.”

Ford is slated to give her testimony first when the hearing at the Dirksen Senate Building begins at 10 a.m. ET. She will present a statement detailing her allegation that Kavanaugh tried to remove her clothes and force himself on her at a high school party in the summer of 1982. His friend Mark Judge was in the room, alternating between egging Kavanaugh on and telling him to stop, she alleges. Kavanaugh, Ford has alleged, covered her mouth when she tried to scream.

Ford’s lawyers have provided to the committee the sworn affidavits of four people supporting her claims, as well as a copy of a polygraph exam she took this summer.

Those claims have remained very consistent since Ford first went public with her story on Sept. 16. But they are missing key details like the exact date and location where the incident occurred. Though victims of sexual assault often forget these kinds of specifics because of the passage of time or trauma they have suffered, holes in the story allow critics to cast them as dishonest, lawyers say.

“Basically, what you’re looking for is internal consistency in the story,” Paul Mones, an L.A.-based attorney who has represented victims of sexual abuse, told TPM. “And that the level of details is consistent throughout.”

If Ford can’t remember details of the night itself, Mones said, she may be asked about “what else she remembers about that time”—other significant events in the days leading up to or following the party.

Lapses represent the greatest challenge for Ford. For Kavanaugh, it will likely be the mountain of new information that has surfaced just over the past week.

A former Yale Law School classmate has accused him of exposing himself to her at a party, and another woman has alleged that Kavanaugh and his friends participated in a debaucherous high school scene in which women, including her, were routinely used for sex.

Kavanaugh has adamantly denied these new allegations. In a Fox News interview, he even claimed that he was a virgin for “many years” after high school and had never consumed alcohol to the point of blacking out. He also provided a calendar to the Senate Judiciary Committee detailing his activities from that summer.

But a host of former students who attended both high school and law school with Kavanaugh have gone on the record about his history of heavy drinking and the fraternity culture he participated in. Footage has also turned up of Kavanaugh himself joking about his youthful drunken exploits.

“Everybody has a tendency to exaggerate,” Alderman, the D.C. attorney said. “It doesn’t mean you’re lying, it means you’re a human being. One of the things we prep our witnesses on is to stop exaggerating, or be careful about it.”

“From that Fox News interview, he seemed like he didn’t get that message,” Alderman said.

Alderman also brought up the fact that Kavanaugh and his Georgetown Prep friends mentioned a girl named Renate Schroeder in their yearbook pages. While some interpreted the claim as a boast of sexual relations, Kavanaugh and other friends who used the caption said it was just a reference to dates they went on with her.

Alderman said he would focus in on this entry if he was questioning Kavanaugh “because that’s one thing where there’s actual written evidence that contradicts what he’s saying.”

The hearing is limited to questioning of Ford and Kavanaugh. No corroborating witnesses will be called. As of Thursday morning, the committee was still scheduled to hold a confirmation vote for Kavanaugh on Friday.

While President Trump claimed at a Wednesday press conference he “could be persuaded” by Ford’s testimony, the gears still appear to be grinding towards a full Senate vote next week.

Read More →

I spent the last three months reporting a story on how hundreds of thousands of Floridians with felony convictions are disenfranchised under Gov. Rick Scott’s clemency process. In phone interviews and in-person conversations in Orlando, I heard fascinating, moving stories from people caught up in the system. The consequences of actions made five and fifteen and twenty-five years ago continue to reverberate through their lives.

Below, we provide more details on their backgrounds that we didn’t have room to capture in the piece.

David Ayala, organizer at Latino Justice

(Photo courtesy of FRRC)

How he got a conviction: Ayala was born and raised in Brooklyn, New York, where he lived with his Puerto Rican mother and her abusive boyfriend. In his telling, he often got trouble in school for acting up, and his mother, who spoke and wrote no English, was coerced into signing him over to live in a group home. It was there that he learned the ropes of the drug trade. Between the ages of 12 and 33, Ayala moved in and out of detention facilities throughout New York and Florida, on charges ranging from possession to intent to sell to conspiracy to sell.

Where he is now: Ayala managed to get a job as a trainer at an L.A. Fitness shortly after leaving prison in 2011 because the application form asked only if he’d been convicted of a felony in the last seven years. “I’d been in jail so long, my conviction was older than that,” Ayala said.

At the gym, he met a woman named Aramis, and the two eventually married and had two girls. Aramis Ayala pushed her husband to graduate from college and get an office job at Sprint, while she embarked on a run for state attorney. Two weeks before the November 2016 election, reporters called her campaign to say they’d learned about David’s criminal history.

“I felt it the night that it actually aired on the news,” Ayala said. “The way they talked about it: the woman who wants to be a top prosecutor is married to a convicted felon. I started realizing there are people in my life that don’t know about my past and they had to find out this way.”

Ayala withdrew, dreading the stares he received from coworkers in the lunch room. He confided only in the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition’s Desmond Meade, who he’d met over Facebook. That experience made him realize he “really didn’t want to work in corporate America anymore,” and he became an activist full time.

What he says about voting rights: “I think under the current administration, it’s a control factor,” Ayala said of the Scott clemency process. “We had a federal judge out of Tallahassee that said the system is broken, it’s unfair, it’s arbitrary, it all depends on how the governor wakes up that morning. He can do what he wants with someone’s life.”

“I’ve been out for 12 years now,” Ayala continued. “I’ve maintained employment, I’ve paid my taxes, I obey the laws, I go to Tallahassee and lobby and advocate for certain bills. But I can’t vote. If you can’t vote, they silence you. You don’t exist to senators, to representatives. Because if you can’t vote for them, why should they listen to you?”

Susanne Manning, reentry coordinator at the FRRC

(Photo courtesy of FRRC)

How she got a conviction: Manning was arrested in the early 1990s for embezzling $400,000 from her former employer, a medical manufacturing company. She spent the money on luxuries like a “cherry apple red Jeep Cherokee,” a Jet Ski, stereo equipment. Sentenced to 30 years in prison, she spent 19 years behind bars. While she was incarcerated, her only child passed away.

“I’m at a stage in my life where I have to accept responsibility,” Manning said, fighting back tears. “I’m totally embarrassed by it — ashamed that I would even do it. Sometimes I look back at my life and I see what I did, and it just seems so foreign to me now that I would do something like that.”

Where she is now: After getting out, Manning had to learn how to use the Internet and find a job through work release. She ended up at a 24-hour answering service, where she worked her way up to a daytime supervisor job, fielding angry calls from clients and complaints from her bosses. In her spare time, she baked cakes for events and tried to help other acquaintances leaving prison reintegrate into society. Through that work, she met Meade.

One day, Meade asked her to send him photographs of her best cakes because, he said, “you’re a returning citizen and you’re doing very well and I want to promote your business.” Manning burst into tears and told Meade how much she hated getting up in the morning to go to the call center, even though she was “grateful to have a job.” Meade offered her a position at the FRRC.

What she says about voting rights: According to Manning, “no one ever told” her she would lose the franchise over her conviction. She learned this only through her work with the FRRC.

But the fact really hit home one day when she was babysitting her great-niece, she said. The girl was acting out, and Manning told her to sit on the couch for a time out.

“She turned around says Aunt Susie, are you going to punish me forever?” Manning said. “And that just kind of knocked me backwards. Because for her, those 10 minutes were forever. And for me, possibly not getting my voting rights back is forever.”

Neil Volz, political director at the FRRC

(Photo courtesy of Volz’s Facebook)

How he got a conviction: In 2007, Volz pleaded guilty to fraud charges for his central role in the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal that TPM closely covered. Volz worked as chief of staff to Republican Rep. Bob Ney before becoming a well-paid lobbyist for Abramoff. In that role, he offered Ney and his staffers trips, free tickets and meals in exchange for promoting legislation beneficial to Abramoff’s clients.

Volz agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors and divulge details of the scheme. He was stripped of his civil rights, but did not serve prison time.

Where he is now: After the scandal blew open, Volz lost his house and got divorced from his wife. Struggling to find work and avoid the ghosts of his Capitol Hill past, Volz eventually moved to Fort Meyers, Florida, where a deceased relative had left behind a condo apartment. He started volunteering at a local homeless organization and attending church regularly, which he found helpful. But steady employment remained a challenge. Volz worked briefly at a beach hotel’s gift shop, where he met the woman who became his second wife, and then as a janitor at a local restaurant. He self-published a memoir, “Into the Sun,” which was received skeptically by the D.C. press.

“That’s a humbling process, from having a view of the White House out of my office to scrubbing toilets,” Volz said.

He married Pam, a pink-haired artist, at a ceremony in his native Ohio. For their honeymoon, the couple went to Indiana to ride horses.

After meeting Meade at an event in 2015, Volz got involved with the FRRC. Meade “knew I had some political experience,” Volz said, and they teamed up to push for Amendment 4’s passage.

What he says about voting rights: “We do our best to stay focused on people first, not politics,” Volz said. “Whether someone can vote, not how they vote. We just kind of stay in that lane and we do our best to not get into some of the hypotheticals.”

“For us its just about trying to stay right in that spot of: do you think this is the right thing to do?”

Read More →

LiveWire