Tierney Sneed

Tierney Sneed is a reporter for Talking Points Memo. She previously worked for U.S. News and World Report. She grew up in Florida and attended Georgetown University.

Articles by

The House Intelligence Committee voted Thursday to release the transcript of its interview with Glenn Simpson, the co-founder of Fusion GPS, the firm that commissioned the Steele dossier. The House committee’s move comes a week after Sen. Dianne Feinstein released the transcript of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s interview with Simpson. Since then, the House committee has been under growing pressure to release its own transcript. (The rules for how the House committee can make the transcript public were different than they were for the Senate Judiciary Committee — Feinstein was legally able to act on her own — thus requiring Thursday’s vote.)

It will be interesting to see the differences between the contents of the two transcripts for a number of reasons. The first is timing: The Senate Judiciary interview occurred in August, while the House committee interviewed Simpson on Nov. 14. Some important things became known during that period. It wasn’t until Oct. 24, for example, that the Washington Post reported that the DNC, via an intermediary law firm, had helped finance the Fusion research on Trump that resulted in the dossier. That story enraged Republicans. A few days later we learned that the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative publication, was bankrolling the research project before the Democrats took over the financing. (Simpson, in his August Senate Judiciary interview, refused to answer any questions that would identify the clients of the Trump research project).

Secondly, Simpson and his firm Fusion GPS have had a much more hostile relationship, at least publicly, with the House committee than it has had with the Senate panels that are probing Trump’s Russia ties. At one point in October, the firm’s lawyers released a letter accusing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes of “unprofessional conduct.” Later, Fusion GPS even brought a legal challenge to block the House Intelligence Committee’s move to subpoena its bank records — though a judge ruled in the committee’s favor, allowing the subpoena to stand.

Read More →

The co-founder of the firm that produced the so-called Trump dossier told the House Intel Committee that early on in his investigation he saw “patterns of activity” from the Trump Organization that “might be suggestive of money laundering,” including dealings with Russian ties.

The allegation was one of many Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson discussed in an interview with the House Committee in November. The transcript was posted online Thursday after a bipartisan committee vote to release it.

The committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) bashed his Republican counterparts in a statement Thursday that said they have “refused to look into” the “key area” of whether the Trump Organization had engaged in money laundering with Russians.

“[W]e hope the release of this transcript will reinforce the importance of these critical questions to our investigation,” Schiff said in the statement.

Read More →

The communications between the White House and an attorney representing Steve Bannon during his House Intel interview Tuesday were about the scope of interview, and the attorney did not, as AP reported, relay “questions, in real time” to the White House, a White House official and a person familiar with the interview told TPM Wednesday.

Bannon’s attorney, Bill Burck, called the White House Counsel’s Office when the committee’s questioning went beyond the scope of Bannon’s time on the Trump campaign, and into the presidential transition and his time in the Trump administration, according to the sources. The White House maintains that congressional committees need to go through an accommodation process with the White House Counsel’s Office before asking about those periods.

Read More →

The Justice Department in a court filing Tuesday said that it had requested that former commissioners on President Trump’s now defunct voter fraud panel not share any non-public records collected by the commission with the Department of Homeland Security, and that DOJ lawyers asked vice chair, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, specifically to refrain from sharing the records.

“He has agreed to do so,” the filing said.

The filing was part of the continued litigation around the commission in the lawsuit a Democratic member, Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap, brought before the commission was shut down by President Trump. Dunlap has since asked the court to prevent Kobach from sharing the records, which include state voter roll data, with the DHS, particularly after Kobach told the media that the DHS would be taking over the commission’s work.

The Justice Department had previously argued that Kobach should not be treated as a defendant in the case — an argument DOJ attorneys reiterated Tuesday.

Read More →

A subplot of Special Counsel Robert’s Mueller’s case against Paul Manafort has been a series of sharp exchanges between the judge and Manafort’s attorney, Kevin Downing.

The sometimes testy interactions between Downing, a DC-based criminal lawyer, and U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson have made it into our reports on the case, but they haven’t been a focal point, in part because the case is still young and there’s a relatively small sample size of interactions.

But on numerous occasions, Jackson has scolded Downing for a lack of clarity in the court motions he’s filed, brought him up short for his interactions with the press, and implicitly questioned his lawyering decisions.

Here are just a few examples:


“This is a criminal trial and not a public-relations campaign.”

Downing started off on a bad foot with Jackson by hosting a press conference in front of the courthouse after Manafort’s arraignment in which he called Mueller’s case against Manafort “ridiculous” and based on “a very novel theory.”

The move earned an implicit rebuke from Jackson the next time Downing appeared in Jackson’s courtroom, where she slapped a gag order on the case.

“This is a criminal trial and not a public relations campaign,” she said.

She said the lawyers should “do their talking in the courtroom and the pleadings, and not on the courthouse steps.”


“Your position has changed two times since you stood up.”

At that same hearing, Jackson expressed confusion over what Downing was asking for as part of a bail package to release Manafort from home confinement.

Downing had previously filed a response to concerns that Mueller had raised about Manafort being a flight risk, but the filing did not explicitly lay out what sort of bond package he was seeking.

“I’m still just not exactly sure what you are asking for,” Jackson said. “Your position has changed two times since you stood up.”

She asked him to file a formal motion seeking to alter the conditions of Manafort’s release by midnight that night — a deadline Downing would end up blowing.

In a motion filed a day late asking for the deadline to be extended, Downing explained that he thought he would be able to meet Thursday night deadline by just reformatting a court document he had previously filed, but he “abandoned” that plan after “carefully considering the Court’s comments.”


“It didn’t come with the necessary information.”

As the bail negotiations dragged on, Jackson grew frustrated with the lack of detail given by Manafort’s attorneys about the worth of his real estate.

“It didn’t come with the necessary information,” the judge said about a bond proposal Downing offered in November.

Questions about Manafort’s assets would dog Downing for weeks. At one point he had to defend using Zilllow to estimate the worth of Manafort’s properties rather than a formal appraisal or tax documents.

“Zillow is actually considered to be pretty accurate,” Downing told the judge, prompting laughter in the court room.


“If I did that, you have to point the error out to me.”

At the hearing on Tuesday, Jackson wondered why Manafort hadn’t submitted the paperwork that would secure his release from home confinement. Downing argued that Jackson’s Dec. 15 order greenlighting his bond package had added $7 million to his required bail.

Jackson was incredulous, and noted that Downing has had a month to raise that issue.

“If I did that, you have to point the error out to me,” she said.


“I’m not entirely sure how you can say what you just said.”

Also on Tuesday, the judge discussed a civil suit Manafort has filed against Mueller. Downing questioned the characterization that the lawsuit was seeking to have Mueller’s indictment against Manafort thrown out.

In response, Jackson pointed to the specific count in the civil complaint asking the court to set aside Mueller’s actions against Manafort.

“I’m not entirely sure how you can say what you just said,” she told Downing.

Read More →

Any hopes by President Trump that the special counsel’s Russia investigation will be wrapped up by the first half of the year were put into question Tuesday, with comments by a federal judge indicating the trial for his former campaign chair and another former aide might not begin until September or October, in the run up to the midterm elections.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson declined to set a trial date for Paul Manafort and Rick Gates at a status conference Tuesday morning. 

Instead, noting the massive amount of discovery the defense was having to work through, she suggested that the May date proposed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team last week was too soon. She hinted that a date in September or October might end up being more appropriate.

Jackson said that a trial date would be nailed down after the first round of motions — in which the defense will have the chance to argue any defects in the prosecution or the indictment — are dealt with. Those motions and responses are to be filed in in February and March, she said, with a hearing on them set for April 17.

She scheduled another status conference before then, for Feb. 14, for other housekeeping issues in the case to be dealt with.

Manafort and Gates have been charged with money laundering, tax evasion and failure to disclose foreign lobbying. Both have pleaded not guilty.

Read the latest reporter’s notebook (Prime access) on this story »


Gates Chastised for Fundraising Video

Jackson also addressed the concerns she had raised last month over a fundraiser held for Gates’ legal defense fund, at which he appeared via a video statement. She had asked his attorneys to explain why that video message was not in violation of a gag order in the case.

The judge said that the legal defense fund was permissible and Gates was allowed to solicit donations and thank those who contributed to it. The problem, Jackson said, was that press was invited to the Dec. 19, fundraiser and that Jack Burkman — the GOP lobbyist who organized the event and whom Gates thanked in his video message — went on to bash the prosecution.

“It is hard to swallow,” she said, that Burkman was not acting as Gates’ surrogate, given that they had coordinated the video message for the event.

If one of Gates’ surrogates is publicly attacking the prosecution, particularly in front of the press, “you should not be cheering them on,” she said.

Gates’ attorney Shanlon Wu noted that they were not involved in putting together the guest list for the event.

Manafort’s Bail Hang-Up

It appeared Gates was close to be released from home confinement, with Jackson asking him to come back to her courtroom Tuesday afternoon to sign a last round of the paperwork before his release.

Manafort’s release, which the judge seemed to green light in a December 15 order, has been stalled by some confusion over what Jackson OKed last month. Manafort’s attorney suggested that her order actually added another $7 million to his bail requirements, for a total of $17 million. Jackson did not agree with this interpretation and pointed out that he has had a month to point out that error, if it did exist, in a motion.

Additionally, Jackson asked that a note from Manafort’s doctor that had been passed along to her be filed as a public notion for her to consider it.

The Civil Lawsuit Against Mueller

Andrew Weissmann, a lawyer for the Mueller team, brought up the civil lawsuit Manafort filed against the special counsel earlier this month. The complaint is in front of another D.C. district court judge. Weissmann indicated that Mueller planned to asked for the civil lawsuit to be dismissed. He questioned whether the venue was appropriate, given that the issues Manafort was raising could have been raised in the criminal case in front of Judge Amy Berman Jackson.

The judge said she was not going to opine on that question since the civil lawsuit wasn’t in front of her, but wondered whether it would be appropriate for that case to be transferred in front of her as well — something that wasn’t required, she said, but could be allowed.

“This is a rather unique situation,” she said, asking Manafort’s attorney if he had a position on transferring the case.

Downing went on to claim that the civil lawsuit was not in fact asking for the indictment against Manafort to be dropped, as had been suggested. Jackson questioned this claim, and even pointed to language in the second count of the civil lawsuit, which asked for the actions Mueller had taken against Manafort to be set aside.

“I’m not entirely sure how you can say what you just said,” Jackson told Downing. She asked the attorney to file by Friday his opinion on whether the civil case should be transferred to her court.

Read the latest editor’s brief (Prime access) on this story »


Read More →

Michael Cohen — President Trump’s longtime personal lawyer who once claimed that there was no such thing as spousal rape — orchestrated a $130,000 payment to an ex-porn star to keep her from publicly discussing allegations that she had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

The payment was part of a nondisclosure agreement negotiations in the fall of 2016, just before Trump was elected, according to the report, which is based on “people familiar with the matter.”

Read More →

Special Counsel Robert Mueller in court filings Friday indicated that he would be seeking a May 14 trial date for former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and campaign aide Rick Gates.

Manafort and Gates have been charged in federal court in Washington with money laundering, tax evasion and failure to disclose foreign lobbying, part of Mueller’s broader probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Both have pleaded not guilty.

The proposed trial date came in a status report to the judge in the case in which Mueller also updated the court on the discovery process.

Mueller’s team has handed over to the defense more than 590,000 items, including “financial records, records from vendors identified in the indictment, email communications involving the defendants, and corporate records,” the filing said.

Mueller’s team has previously told the court in filings that it will likely need three weeks to lay out its case against Manafort and Gates.

Read the filing below:

Read More →

Comments by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, which may have been an attempt to save face as his voter fraud commission was dissolved, have created a number of headaches for the Justice Department attorneys defending the defunct commission in the various lawsuits against it.

“The investigations will continue now, but they won’t be able to stall it through litigation,” Kobach told Breitbart News after the commission was dissolved. That interview has since been referenced in multiple court documents filed by commissions’ legal challengers.

Kobach’s claims — as well as similar claims made by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and by President Trump himself — about the next steps for the commission’s so-called investigation have been repeatedly rebuked by government officials in court filings and hearings.

Read More →

A federal judge in Washington on Thursday ordered the government to turn over for his review behind closed doors the so-called Comey memos, that various outlets are suing the Justice Department to release.

The DOJ has said releasing the memos would undermine the ongoing federal investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It had previously asked the judge, James E. Boasberg, to review an affidavit from an FBI employee explaining why releasing the memos is an issue for the probe.

Boasberg said on Thursday that he would review that declaration, as well as “all withheld documents,” in camera — meaning within his chambers – and without the other side in the case seeing them. He gave the DOJ until Jan. 18 to turn the documents over.

CNN, USA Today, and other journalists, as well as the conservative group Judicial Watch, sued the Justice Department for allegedly violating the Freedom of Information Act in withholding the memos. The memos were written by former FBI Director James Comey and are accounts of meetings with Trump where Comey claims the President pressured him to drop his investigation into former National Security Advisor Mike Flynn.

Trump fired Comey last May, and the existence of the memos became known first through press leaks and then through Comey’s dramatic testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The lawyers representing the outlets in the FOIA case cheered the judge’s move to review the memos, according to CNN.

“It’s rather heartening that Judge Boasberg has chosen to review the Comey memoranda himself, instead of just relying upon the descriptions in the agency affidavits. Given the significant public interest value inherent in these documents, the Government’s arguments against disclosure of them at all should be addressed with utmost caution,” Bradley Moss, who is representing USA Today in the case, told CNN.

Read More →